Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States v. Michael O'ShaughneSSy
772 F.2d 111
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1985-08-30
- Topic
- bankruptcy
PER CURIAM: Treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, it is ordered that the petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED. It is further ordered that supplemental briefing be on an expedited basis with the schedule to be set by the Clerk. The case will be assigned to the first available oral argument calendar after briefing.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Michael O'ShaughneSSy. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
UNITED STATES v. O'SHAUGHNESSY,772 F.2d 111(5th Cir. 1985)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. MICHAEL O'SHAUGHNESSY,
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
No. 85-2360.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
August 30, 1985.
Henry K. Oncken, U.S. Atty., James R. Gough, Jr., James J. Powers, Asst. U.S. Attys., Houston, Tex., Ann Wallace, Atty., Crim. Division, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.
[1] ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
[2] (Opinion 06/18/85, 5 Cir., 1985,764 F.2d 1035)
Before RUBIN, RANDALL and TATE, Circuit Judges.