Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

John Harvey Adamson v. James G. Ricketts

John Harvey Adamson v. James G. Ricketts, 764 F.2d 1343 (9th Cir. 1985)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1985-07-03
Topic: bankruptcy

ORDER Upon a vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be heard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn, 758 F.2d 441.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed John Harvey Adamson v. James G. Ricketts. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 5 opinions

ADAMSON v. RICKETTS,764 F.2d 1343(9th Cir. 1985)

JOHN HARVEY ADAMSON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. JAMES G. RICKETTS, ET AL.,

RESPONDENT-APPELLEE.

No. 84-2069.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 3, 1985.

Timothy K. Ford, Seattle, Wash., Timothy J. Foley, Hancock, Rothert Bunshoft, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner-appellant.

William J. Schafer, III, Phoenix, Ariz., for respondent-appellee.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

[1] ORDER

[2] Upon a vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be heard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn,758 F.2d 441.Page 1344