Opinion · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of America
San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. United States Nuclear Regul. Comm’n & the United States of Am., 760 F.2d 1320 (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1985)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1985-05-01
- Topic
- litigation
ORDER PER CURIAM. Upon consideration of petitioners’ motion for leave to file exhibits in support of the *1321 suggestion for rehearing en banc, the responses thereto, and of the suggestion for rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the motion for leave to file exhibits is granted, and it is FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that petitioners’ suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted in part, and it is FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that only Section III.B of the Court’s opinion, 751 F.2d 1287 and the corresponding part of the judgment of the Court, issued on December 31, 1984, are hereby vacated, and it is FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the full power operating license remains in effect and is not stayed pending the rehearing en banc. BORK, Circuit Judge would deny the motion for leave to file exhibits in support of the suggestion and would deny the suggestion.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of America. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 34 opinions
ORDER
PER CURIAM.Upon consideration of petitioners’ motion for leave to file exhibits in support of the *1321 suggestion for rehearing en banc, the responses thereto, and of the suggestion for rehearing en banc, it is
ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the motion for leave to file exhibits is granted, and it is
FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that petitioners’ suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted in part, and it is
FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that only Section III.B of the Court’s opinion, 751 F.2d 1287 and the corresponding part of the judgment of the Court, issued on December 31, 1984, are hereby vacated, and it is
FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the full power operating license remains in effect and is not stayed pending the rehearing en banc.
BORK, Circuit Judge would deny the motion for leave to file exhibits in support of the suggestion and would deny the suggestion.