Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Candace J. Sullivan v. The United States

Candace J. Sullivan v. United States, 742 F.2d 628 (Fed. Cir. 1984)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1984-09-06
Topic
bankruptcy

PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from the United States Claims Court which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and denied defendant’s motion to dismiss this claim for severance pay. We affirm. OPINION The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed by the Claims Court. Sullivan v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Candace J. Sullivan v. The United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
13 opinions
SULLIVAN v. UNITED STATES,742 F.2d 628(Fed. Cir. 1984)
CANDACE J. SULLIVAN, APPELLEE, v. THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANT.
No. 84-806.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
September 6, 1984.
Robert A. Reutershan, Washington, D.C., argued for appellant. With him on the brief were Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., and David M. Cohen, Washington, D.C., Director.

Roxanne Ando, Washington, D.C., of Office of the Gen. Counsel Dept. of Educ., of counsel.

John Salter, Washington, D.C., of Office of the Gen. Counsel Office of Personnel Management.

Steven M. Schneebaum, Washington, D.C., argued for appellee. With him on the brief was Lisa A. Shapiro, Washington, D.C.
Appealed from, U.S. Claims Court; Judge Mayer.
Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
[1] This is an appeal from the United States Claims Court which granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and denied defendant's motion to dismiss this claim for severance pay. Weaffirm.
[2] OPINION
[3] The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed by the Claims Court.Sullivan v. United States,4 Cl.Ct. 70 (1983).

[4] AFFIRMED.Page 1388