Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

ITCO Corp. v. Michelin Tire Corp.

742 F.2d 170

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1984-08-29
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: The judgment of the district court is reversed, and this case is remanded for reasons stated in the opinion of the original panel. ITCO Corp. v. Michelin Tire Corp., Commercial Division, 722 F.2d 42 (4th Cir.1983). Judge Russell dissents for the reasons stated in his dissent to the panel opinion. 722 F.2d at 53-55.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed ITCO Corp. v. Michelin Tire Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
2 opinions
ITCO CORP. v. MICHELIN TIRE CORP. COM. DIV.,742 F.2d 170(4th Cir. 1984)
ITCO CORPORATION, APPELLANT v. MICHELIN TIRE CORPORATION, COMMERCIAL
DIVISION, APPELLEE. AND
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, AMICUS CURIAE.
ITCO CORPORATION, APPELLEE v. MICHELIN TIRE CORPORATION, COMMERCIAL
DIVISION, APPELLANT.
Nos. 82-2177(L), 82-2178.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Argued April 4, 1984.
Decided August 29, 1984.
Charles Gordon Brown, Chapel Hills, N.C. (Jordan, Brown, Price Wall, Chapel Hill, N.C., John R. Jordan, Jr., Jordan, Brown, Price Wall, Samuel W. Johnson, Meadows, Johnson Spinks, Rocky Mount, N.C., John F. Dienelt, Brownstein, Zeidman Schomer, Washington, D.C., on brief), for appellants.

J. Brantley Phillips, Jr., Natalma M. McKnew, Greenville, S.C. (Fletcher C. Mann, Leatherwood, Walker, Tood Mann, Greenville, S.C., Jerry S. Alvis, Young, Moore, Henderson Alvis, Raleigh, N.C., on brief), for appellee.

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen. of N.C., H.A. Cole, Jr., Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., John R. Corne, Associate Atty. Gen., Raleigh, N.C., on brief, as amicus curiae.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., District Judge.
Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
[1] The judgment of the district court is reversed, and this case is remanded for reasons stated in the opinion of the original panel.ITCO Corp. v. Michelin Tire Corp., Commercial Division,722 F.2d 42(4th Cir. 1983). Judge Russell dissents for the reasons stated in his dissent to the panel opinion.722 F.2d at 53-55.Page 811