Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Janet Woodley

732 F.2d 111

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1984-04-26
Topic: general

ORDER Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn, 726 F.2d 1328 (9th Cir.1983).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Janet Woodley. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

UNITED STATES v. WOODLEY,732 F.2d 111(9th Cir. 1984)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. JANET WOODLEY,

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

No. 82-1028.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 26, 1984.

Elliot Enoki, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiff-appellee.

Pamela J. Berman, Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendant-appellant.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY,Page 112BOOCHEVER, NORRIS and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

[1] ORDER

[2] Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn,726 F.2d 1328(9th Cir. 1983).Page 676