Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Wheeler v. Heckler

724 F.2d 262

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1983-12-02
Topic
bankruptcy

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge: On petition for rehearing, the plaintiffs contend that our decision, 719 F.2d 595, has rejected what they characterize as “the improvement standard” for determining when disability benefits, once awarded, may be terminated. The issue on the merits that we decided was whether a grandfatheree, a person found to be disabled under the standards of a state plan in effect for October 1972 and receiving payments since December 1973, could continue to receive benefits if he met the disability standards of Vermont’s plan in effect for October 1972. We answered in the affirmative. We rejected the Secretary’s view that the plaintiff must meet only the prevailing federal standard; we disagreed with the Secretary’s alternative contentions that the federal standard was equivalent to the Vermont standard and that the Vermont standard was not ascertainable. We also rejected the District Court’s ruling that every grandfathered beneficiary could resist termination of benefits, in lieu of showing continued disability under the Vermont standard, simply by pointing to a prior finding of disability and relying on the Secretary’s failure to prove that his current medical condition had improved compared to what it had been at the time of the disability determination.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Wheeler v. Heckler. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions