Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Anderson v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (lloyd Royal) Society

72 F.2d 1008

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1934-09-12
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. Upon hearing oral arguments of proctors for respective parties, and consideration of the apostles on appeal and briefs filed in this cause, it is ordered that the decree of the District Court be affirmed, and that a decree be filed and entered accordingly.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Anderson v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (lloyd Royal) Society. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions
ANDERSON v. COMPAGNIE MARITIME BELGE,72 F.2d 1008(9th Cir. 1934)
Estella ANDERSON et al. v. COMPAGNIE MARITIME BELGE (LLOYD ROYAL) SOCIETY,
Claimant of THE SS MERCIER, etc.
No. 7521.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
September 12, 1934.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon; James Alger Fee, Judge.

For opinion below, see5 F. Supp. 511.
William P. Lord, of Portland, Or., for appellant.

Wood, Montague, Mathiessen Rankin and Erskine Wood, all of Portland, Or., for appellee.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and GARRECHT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Upon hearing oral arguments of proctors for respective parties, and consideration of the apostles on appeal and briefs filed in this cause, it is ordered that the decree of the District Court be affirmed, and that a decree be filed and entered accordingly.Page 1009