Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc. v. Instromedix, Inc.

Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of Am., Inc. v. Instromedix, Inc., 718 F.2d 971 (9th Cir. 1983)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1983-10-20
Topic: bankruptcy

*972ORDER Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment, 712 F.2d 1305 (9th Cir.1983) is withdrawn. Oral argument in the above case will be held in San Francisco, on Tuesday, November 15, 1983, at 1:30 p.m.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc. v. Instromedix, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

PACEMAKER DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC v. INSTROMEDIX,718 F.2d 971(9th Cir. 1983)

PACEMAKER DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC OF AMERICA, INC., A TENNESSEE CORPORATION,

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CROSS-APPELLEE, v. INSTROMEDIX, INC., AN OREGON

CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE, CROSS-APPELLANT.

Nos. 82-3152, 82-3182.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

October 20, 1983.

J. Pierre Kolisch, Kolisch, Hartwell, Dickinson Stuart, Portland, Or., for defendant-appellee, cross-appellant.

Sherman O. Parrett, Cushman, Darby Cushman, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant, cross-appellee.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.Page 972

[1] ORDER

[2] Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment, 712 F.2d 1305 (9th Cir. 1983) is withdrawn.

[3] Oral argument in the above case will be held in San Francisco, on Tuesday, November 15, 1983, at 1:30 p.m.