Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Rosa Candida Martinez-Romero v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Rosa Candida Martinez-Romero v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 692 F.2d 595 (9th Cir. 1982)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1982-11-10
Topic
labor-and-employment

How later courts describe this case

  • concerning general civil strife

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Rosa Candida Martinez-Romero v. Immigration and Naturalization Service. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
65 opinions
MARTINEZ-ROMERO v. IMMIGRATION NAT. SERVICE,692 F.2d 595(9th Cir. 1982)
ROSA CANDIDA MARTINEZ-ROMERO, PETITIONER, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION
SERVICE, RESPONDENT.
No. 80-7676.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted November 1, 1982.
Decided November 10, 1982.
Jerry Kaplan, Ronald G. Bakal, Bakal Kaplan, Beverly Hills, Cal., for petitioner.

Ingrid K. Hrycenko, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., for respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Before CHAMBERS, ROBBfn*and ALARCON, Circuit Judges.
[1] The orders of the Immigration and Naturalization Service before us for review are affirmed.

[2] If we were to agree with the petitioner's contention that no person should be returned to El Salvador because of the reported anarchy present there now, it would permit the whole population, if they could enter this country some way, to stay herePage 596indefinitely. There must be some special circumstances present before relief can be granted.
  1. The Honorable Roger Robb, United States Circuit Judge for the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, sitting by designation. ↩