Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Rossmoore v. Anderson

67 F.2d 1009

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1933-12-04
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Judgment (1 F. Supp. 35) affirmed on the authority of Lucas v. Earl, 281 U. S. 111, 50 S.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Rossmoore v. Anderson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

ROSSMOORE v. ANDERSON,67 F.2d 1009(2nd Cir. 1933)

Emerson E. ROSSMOORE, Appellant, v. Charles W. ANDERSON, Individually and

as Collector of Internal Revenue for the Third District of New York,

Appellee.

No. 75.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

December 4, 1933.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

Zeiger Berliner, of New York City, and Nelson T. Hartson, of Washington, D.C. (Ephraim Berliner and Joseph J. Zeiger, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

George Z. Medalie, U.S. Atty., of New York City (Harry G. Herman, Asst. U.S. Atty., of New York City, and Frederick W. Dewart, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., of counsel), for appellee.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment (1 F. Supp. 35) affirmed on the authority of Lucas v. Earl,281 U.S. 111, 50 S. Ct. 241, 74 L. Ed. 731; Burnet v. Leininger,285 U.S. 136, 52 S. Ct. 345, 76 L. Ed. 665; Burnet v. Wells,289 U.S. 670, 53 S. Ct. 761, 77 L. Ed. 1439; Harris v. Com'r,39 F.2d 546(C.C.A. 2).