Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

SPIESS v. ITOH COMPANY (AMERICA), INC., 664 F.2d 480 (5th Cir. 1981)

MICHAEL E. SPIESS, JACK K. HARDY & BENJAMIN F. ROUNTREE,PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. C. ITOH Co. (AMERICA), INC.,DEFENDANT-APPELLANT., 664 F.2d 480 (United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.[fn*]Unit A. 1981)

Type
Opinion
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1981-12-09
Topic
general

SPIESS v. ITOH COMPANY (AMERICA), INC., 664 F.2d 480 (5th Cir. 1981) MICHAEL E. SPIESS, JACK K. HARDY AND BENJAMIN F. ROUNTREE,PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SPIESS v. ITOH COMPANY (AMERICA), INC., 664 F.2d 480 (5th Cir. 1981). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SPIESS v. ITOH COMPANY (AMERICA), INC.,664 F.2d 480(5th Cir. 1981)
MICHAEL E. SPIESS, JACK K. HARDY AND BENJAMIN F. ROUNTREE,
PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. C. ITOH COMPANY (AMERICA), INC.,
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
No. 79-2382.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.fn*
Unit A.
December 9, 1981.
Certiorari Dismissed January 5, 1982.
Fulbright Jaworski, Joe P. Martin, Neil Martin, Nancy Morrison O'Connor, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

Porter Clements, Edward John O'Neill, Jr., Charles E. Humphrey, Jr., Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Lutz Alexander Prager, E.E.O.C., Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas,469 F. Supp. 1; Carl O. Bue, Jr., Judge.Page 481
Before BROWN, AINSWORTHfn**, CHARLES CLARK, GEE, RUBIN, GARZA, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON, WILLIAMS and GARWOOD, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
[1] In light of the grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court of the United States inAvigliano v. Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc.,___ U.S. ___,102 S.Ct. 501,70 L.Ed.2d 377, andSumitomo ShojiAmerica, Inc. v. Avigliano,___ U.S. ___,102 S.Ct. 1420,71 L.Ed.2d 644, it is ordered that the order of this court requiring the above styled cause to be reheard en banc,654 F.2d 302, is vacated and the opinion of the panel dated the 24th day of April, 1981,643 F.2d 353, is reinstated.
  1. Former Fifth Circuit case, Section 9(1) of Public Law96-452— October 14, 1980. ↩
  2. Because of illness, Judge Ainsworth did not participate in the consideration of this order. ↩