Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Louisville Plate Glass Company, Inc.

657 F.2d 106

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1981-08-28
Topic
bankruptcy

ORDER This case is before the court on an Application for Enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) which found that the respondent Louisville Plate Glass Company, Inc. had violated sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., in refusing to execute a contract negotiated by the union and representatives for a group of employers. In so holding, the NLRB found that the company had not lawfully withdrawn from a multi-employer bargaining arrangement prior to the time an agreement was reached because there was no impasse in the negotiations and the union had not consented to the withdrawal. Upon consideration of the record as a whole, the court is of the opinion that substantial evidence supports these determinations. Accordingly, The Order of the National Labor Relations Board, reported at 243 N.L.R.B. No. 182 (1978), is enforced.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed National Labor Relations Board v. Louisville Plate Glass Company, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
6 opinions
ORDER

This case is before the court on an Application for Enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) which found that the respondent Louisville Plate Glass Company, Inc. had violated sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., in refusing to execute a contract negotiated by the union and representatives for a group of employers. In so holding, the NLRB found that the company had not lawfully withdrawn from a multi-employer bargaining arrangement prior to the time an agreement was reached because there was no impasse in the negotiations and the union had not consented to the withdrawal.

Upon consideration of the record as a whole, the court is of the opinion that substantial evidence supports these determinations. Accordingly,

The Order of the National Labor Relations Board, reported at 243 N.L.R.B. No. 182 (1978), is enforced.