Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DaMato v. Turner & Newall, Ltd.

DaMato v. Turner & Newall, Ltd., 651 F.2d 908 (3d Cir. 1981)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1981-06-22
Topic
bankruptcy

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM: The question for decision in this appeal by plaintiffs from adverse summary judgments in diversity actions brought under Pennsylvania law is whether the district court erred in determining that when the plaintiffs knew the physical causes and sources of their injuries, their lack of knowledge about the legal bases for prospective claims will not toll the Pennsylvania statute of limitations. We affirm. We are satisfied that Judge Newcomer’s opinion in Grabowski v. Turner & Newall, 516 F.Supp. 114 (E.D.Pa.1980), sets forth the appropriate legal precepts and properly applied the undisputed facts thereto. Additional support for the view we take is found in Volpe v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed DaMato v. Turner & Newall, Ltd.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
12 opinions