Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Burnside v. Sanders Associates, Inc.

643 F.2d 389

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1981-03-27
Topic
litigation

PER CURIAM: We affirm the judgment appealed from for the reasons set forth in the district court’s opinion, published at 507 F.Supp. 165 (N.D.Tex.1980). AFFIRMED.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Burnside v. Sanders Associates, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
BURNSIDE v. SANDERS ASSOCIATES, INC.,643 F.2d 389(5th Cir. 1981)
WAYNE BURNSIDE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SANDERS ASSOCIATES, INC., HARRIS
CORPORATION AND HARRIS DATA COMMUNICATIONS, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.
No. 80-1161.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Unit A.
March 27, 1981.
Berman, Fichtner Mitchell, Harold B. Berman, Douglas E. Yeager, Dallas, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.

Thompson, Knight, Simmons Bullion, John A. Mackintosh, Jr., Dallas, Tex., for Sanders Assoc.

Jackson, Walker, Winstead, Cantwell Miller, Jack Pew, Jr., Dallas, Tex., for Harris Corp. and Harris Data.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Robert M. Hill, Judge.
Before RUBIN and GARZA, Circuit Judges, and SUTTLEfn*, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
[1] We affirm the judgment appealed from for the reasons set forth in the district court's opinion, published at507 F. Supp. 165(N.D.Tex. 1980).

[2] AFFIRMED.Page 1034
  1. District Judge of Western District of Texas, sitting by designation. ↩