Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Ann M. McKenzie v. Howard H. Calloway, Robert E. Hampton, Jayne B. Spain, and L. J. Andolsek, in Their Official Capacities

625 F.2d 754

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1980-08-13
Topic
litigation

ORDER Plaintiff appeals the District Court’s grant of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to counts I and II of her complaint, and the dismissal of Count III. Upon consideration of the briefs and oral arguments of counsel together with the record on appeal, the Court concludes that the decision of the District Court is correct. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the District Court’s opinion, which is reported at 456 F.Supp. 590 (E.D.Mich.1978).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ann M. McKenzie v. Howard H. Calloway, Robert E. Hampton, Jayne B. Spain, and L. J. Andolsek, in Their Official Capacities. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
McKENZIE v. CALLOWAY,625 F.2d 754(6th Cir. 1980)
ANN M. McKENZIE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HOWARD H. CALLOWAY, ROBERT E.
HAMPTON, JAYNE B. SPAIN, AND L.J. ANDOLSEK, IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES,
DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.
No. 78-1493.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
August 13, 1980.
Clyde W. McKenzie, Birmingham, Mich., Fred W. Gerow, Plunkett, Cooney, Rutt, Watters, Stanczyk Pedersen, Southfield, Mich., for plaintiff-appellant.Page 755

James K. Robinson, U.S. Atty., L. Michael Wicks, Asst. U.S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from Eastern District of Michigan, S.D. at Detroit.
Before CELEBREZZE and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and SILER, District Judge.fn*
[1] ORDER
[2] Plaintiff appeals the District Court's grant of the defendants' motion for summary judgment as to counts I and II of her complaint, and the dismissal of Count III. Upon consideration of the briefs and oral arguments of counsel together with the record on appeal, the Court concludes that the decision of the District Court is correct.

[3] Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the District Court's opinion, which is reported at456 F. Supp. 590(E.D.Mich. 1978).Page 269
  1. Honorable Eugene Edward Siler, Jr., United States District Court for the Eastern and Western Districts of Kentucky, sitting by designation. ↩