Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Armour v. City of Anniston

622 F.2d 1226

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1980-07-15
Topic: bankruptcy

How later courts describe this case

On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Armour v. City of Anniston. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 10 opinions

ARMOUR v. CITY OF ANNISTON,622 F.2d 1226(5th Cir. 1980)

IDA VENE ARMOUR, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF ANNISTON, D/B/A ANNISTON

MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND NORTHEAST ALABAMA MEDICAL CENTER BOARD,

DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

No. 77-1778.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 15, 1980.

Edward Still, Susan W. Reeves, Birmingham, Ala., Neil Bradley, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.

Walter J. Merrill, Anniston, Ala., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, J. Foy Guin, Judge.

Before MORGAN, FAY and RUBIN, Circuit Judges.

[1] ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

[2] ORDER:

[3] Considering the order entered by the United States Supreme Court inArmour v. City of Anniston, d/b/a Anniston MemorialHospital and Northeast Alabama Medical Center Board,___ U.S. ___,100 S.Ct. 1334,63 L.Ed.2d 774(1980), the case is remanded to the district court to determine, after such hearing or hearings as it may see fit, whether or not there is still a live controversy involving the proposed class, and, if so, whether or not Mrs. Armour is a proper class representative, and, if she is not, to substitute an appropriate class representative should one desire to be appointed.

[4] IT IS SO ORDERED.