Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. v. Boeing-Vertol Company, Etc., Boeing-Vertol Company, a Division of the Boeing Company, Messerschmitt-Boelkow-Blohm Gmbh

Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. v. Boeing-Vertol Co., Etc., Boeing-Vertol Co., a Div. of the Boeing Co., Messerschmitt-Boelkow-Blohm Gmbh, 606 F.2d 114 (5th Cir. 1979)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1979-11-05
Topic: general

PER CURIAM: Affirmed on the basis of the opinion of District Judge Fred J. Cassibry dated January 29, 1979, 478 F.Supp. 84 (E.D.La.1979). The appeal was proper by virtue of the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). See A & E Plastik Pak v. Monsanto Co., 9 Cir., 1968, 396 F.2d 710.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. v. Boeing-Vertol Company, Etc., Boeing-Vertol Company, a Division of the Boeing Company, Messerschmitt-Boelkow-Blohm Gmbh. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 6 opinions

PETROLEUM HELICOPTERS, v. BOEING-VERTOL CO.,606 F.2d 114(5th Cir. 1979)

PETROLEUM HELICOPTERS, INC., PLAINTIFF, v. BOEING-VERTOL COMPANY, ETC., ET

AL., DEFENDANTS, BOEING-VERTOL COMPANY, A DIVISION OF THE BOEING COMPANY,

DEFENDANT-APPELLEE, MESSERSCHMITT-BOELKOW-BLOHM GMBH, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

No. 79-1937.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

November 5, 1979.

Liskow Lewis, Stephen T. Victory, Larry M. Roedel, New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellant.

Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie Sims, Harry S. Redmon, Jr., New Orleans, La., Clark R. Nichols, Seattle, Wash., for defendant-appellee.

Lemle, Kelleher, Kohlmeyer Matthews, James H. Brown, Jr., New Orleans, La., for other interested parties.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, Fred J. Cassibry, Judge.

Before AINSWORTH, VANCE and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[1] Affirmed on the basis of the opinion of District Judge Fred J. Cassibry dated January 29, 1979,478 F. Supp. 84(E.D.La. 1979).

[2] The appeal was proper by virtue of the provisions of28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1).See A E Plastik Pak v. Monsanto Co.,9 Cir., 1968,396 F.2d 710.See also McCreary Tire Rubber Company v.CEAT,3 Cir., 1974,501 F.2d 1032;Warren Bros. Company v.Cardi Corp.,1 Cir., 1973,471 F.2d 1304;Ephraim Freightways,Inc. v. Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc.,10 Cir.,376 F.2d 40,cert. denied,389 U.S. 829,88 S.Ct. 92,19 L.Ed.2d 87(1967).

[3] AFFIRMED.