Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Universal Amusement Co. v. Vance

Universal Amusement Co. v. Vance, 587 F.2d 176 (5th Cir. 1978)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1978-12-18
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: The en banc court adopts as its opinion herein so much of the panel opinion as commences at 559 F.2d 1286 following the sub-heading “II. DEXTER v. BUTLER.” We supplement the portion of that opinion concerning attorneys’ fees by reference to Part IV of our en banc opinion in the King Arts Theatre case handed dov/n today, 587 F.2d 159 (5th Cir. 1978). It is so ORDERED.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Universal Amusement Co. v. Vance. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
10 opinions
UNIVERSAL AMUSEMENT COMPANY, INC. v. VANCE,587 F.2d 176(5th Cir. 1978)
UNIVERSAL AMUSEMENT COMPANY, INC., ET AL., v. CAROL VANCE ET AL.
RICHARD C. DEXTER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. TED BUTLER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF
BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
No. 75-4313.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
December 18, 1978.
Rehearing Denied January 19, 1979.
Max P. Flusche, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., John L. Hill, Atty. Gen., David M. Kendall,Page 177First Asst. Atty. Gen., Joe B. Dibrell, Lonny F. Zwiener, Asst. Attys. Gen., Austin, Tex., for State of Texas.

Douglas C. Young, Keith W. Burris, Asst. Crim. D. Attys., San Antonio, Tex., for Butler.

Edgar Pfeil, Asst. City Atty., Jane Haun Macon, Steven W. Arronge, Asst. City Attys., San Antonio, Tex., for Peters.

Frierson M. Graves, Jr., Memphis, Tenn., Gerald H. Goldstein, San Antonio, Tex., for R. C. Dexter Southland King Arts.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN and VANCE, Circuit Judges.fn*
PER CURIAM:
[1] The en banc court adopts as its opinion herein so much of the panel opinion as commences at559 F.2d 1286following the sub-heading "II.DEXTER v. BUTLER." We supplement the portion of that opinion concerning attorneys' fees by reference to Part IV of our en banc opinion in the king Arts Theatre case handed down today,587 F.2d 159(5th Cir. 1978). It is so ORDERED.
  1. Judge Morgan was a member of the en banc court under28 U.S.C.A. § 46(c) and participated in the oral argument of the case en banc. Subsequently, the Omnibus Judgeship Bill, Public Law95-486(95th Congress) was approved October 20, 1978. In view of this, Judge Morgan does not participate in this decision. ↩