Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Jose Estrada v. United States

Jose Estrada v. United States, 585 F.2d 742 (5th Cir. 1978)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1978-12-04
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks reinstatement of an appeal that was dismissed without prejudice three and one-half years ago when he removed himself from the jurisdiction of this court by becoming a fugitive. 1 The only reason his motion for reinstatement is before us now is because he was recently recaptured and forcibly returned to the jurisdiction of this court. A motion to reinstate an abandoned appeal is an extraordinary request. United States v. Smith, 5 Cir. 1977, 544 F.2d 832. There is no constitutional right to reinstatement of an appeal abandoned by escape.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Jose Estrada v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
14 opinions
ESTRADA, v. UNITED STATES,585 F.2d 742(5th Cir. 1978)
JOSE ESTRADA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE.
No. 75-8095.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
December 4, 1978.
Jack R. Nageley, Miami Beach, Fla., Peter F. K. Baraban, Miami, Fla., for defendant-appellant.

Ralph N. Person, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
Before THORNBERRY, GODBOLD and RUBIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
[1] Appellant seeks reinstatement of an appeal that was dismissed without prejudice three and one-half years ago when he removed himself from the jurisdiction of this court by becoming a fugitive.1The only reason his motion for reinstatement is before us now is because he was recently recaptured and forcibly returned to the jurisdiction of this court.

[2] A motion to reinstate an abandoned appeal is an extraordinary request.United States v. Smith,5 Cir. 1977,544 F.2d 832. There is no constitutional right to reinstatement of an appeal abandoned by escape.Estelle v. Dorrough,1975,420 U.S. 534,95 S.Ct. 1173,43 L.Ed.2d 377. Nor is there a right to automatic reinstatement of an appeal dismissed without prejudice because of the appellant's escape.See United States v. Smith, supra.Because of the period of time that has elapsed since appellant was tried, there would be substantial danger of prejudice to the government if appeal were allowed at this time and were successful; therefore we would not allow reinstatement without at least a showing of good cause. In the absence of any evidence that appellant was not actually a fugitive or of any explanation for his conduct, he has failed to meet the threshold requirement that would justify reinstatement of aPage 743right that he has relinquished.See United States v. Shelton,5 Cir. 1975,508 F.2d 797,cert. denied,423 U.S. 828,96 S.Ct. 45,46 L.Ed.2d 44;Fratus v. United States,5 Cir. 1974,496 F.2d 1190.

[3] For the foregoing reasons, the motion to reinstate appeal is DENIED.
  1. It is appropriate to dispose of this case summarily. SeeGroendyke Transportation, Inc. v. Davis,5 Cir. 1969,406 F.2d 1158. ↩