Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Thomas Earl Henderson, Jr. v. Fort Worth Independent School District

Thomas Earl Henderson, Jr. v. Fort Worth Indep. Sch. Dist., 584 F.2d 115 (5th Cir. 1978)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1978-11-17
Topic
bankruptcy

PER CURIAM: In this case, a panel of the Court affirmed the district court by a written opin *116 ion. Henderson v. Fort Worth Independent School District, 574 F.2d 1210 (5th Cir. 1978). A petition for rehearing en banc was granted, which effectively vacates the panel opinion as a citable precedent. With the panel opinion vacated, the en banc court has reached an even division as to the issues raised on appeal.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Thomas Earl Henderson, Jr. v. Fort Worth Independent School District. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
22 opinions
HENDERSON v. FORT WORTH INDEPENDENT SCH. DIST.,584 F.2d 115(5th Cir. 1978)
THOMAS EARL HENDERSON, JR., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. FORT WORTH
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
No. 77-2839.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 17, 1978.
Art J. Brender, Fort Worth, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants.

John A. Buckley, American Civil Liberties Foundation of Texas, Inc., Austin, Tex., for amicus curiae, American Civil Liberties et al.

Cecil A. Morgan, David B. Owen, Fort Worth, Tex., for Fort Worth Independent School Dist. et al.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Eldon B. Mahon, Judge.
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN and VANCE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
[1] In this case, a panel of the Court affirmed the district court by a written opinion.Page 116Henderson v. Fort Worth Independent School District,574 F.2d 1210(5th Cir. 1978). A petition for rehearingenbancwas granted, which effectively vacates the panel opinion as a citable precedent. With the panel opinion vacated, theenbanccourt has reached an even division as to the issues raised on appeal. Thus, the district court is affirmed by operation of law, and the decision of the court of appeals has no precedential value.

[2] AFFIRMED BY OPERATION OF LAW.