Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.

577 F.2d 1030

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1978-08-02
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: On June 5, 1978, the Supreme Court of the United States, pursuant to a petition for a writ of certiorari and response thereto, rendered its order vacating the judgment of this Court (553 F.2d 480) and remanded the cause to us for further consideration in light of Marshall v. Barlow’s, Inc., 436 U.S. -, 98 S.Ct. 1816, 56 L.Ed.2d 305 (1978). Under the circumstances, it is necessary that the matter receive further consideration in the District Court in light of the order of the Supreme Court of the United States. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is vacated and the cause is remanded for consideration in light of the Supreme Court’s order. VACATED AND REMANDED.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions
UNITED STATES v. NEW ORLEANS PUB. SERV., INC.,577 F.2d 1030(5th Cir. 1978)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. NEW ORLEANS PUBLIC SERVICE,
INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
No. 75-1130.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
August 2, 1978.
Michael J. Molony, Jr., New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellant.

Gerald J. Gallinghouse, U.S. Atty., New Orleans, La., David L. Rose, Chief, Employment Div., Louis G. Ferrand, Jr., Naomi E. White, Attys., Civ. Rights Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.

Michael Farrell, E. Grady Jolly, Jackson, Miss., for amicus curiae.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Fred J. Cassibry, District Judge.
On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, ___ U.S. ___,98 S.Ct. 2841,56 L.Ed.2d 783.
Before AINSWORTH and CLARK, Circuit Judges, and HUGHES, District Judge.fn*Page 1031
PER CURIAM:
[1] On June 5, 1978, the Supreme Court of the United States, pursuant to a petition for a writ of certiorari and response thereto, rendered its order vacating the judgment of this Court (553 F.2d 459) and remanded the cause to us for further consideration in light ofMarshall v. Barlow's, Inc.,436 U.S. ___,98 S.Ct. 1816,56 L.Ed.2d 305(1978).

[2] Under the circumstances, it is necessary that the matter receive further consideration in the District Court in light of the order of the Supreme Court of the United States.

[3] Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is vacated and the cause is remanded for consideration in light of the Supreme Court's order.

[4] VACATED AND REMANDED.
  1. Senior District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, sitting by designation. ↩