Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Murphy v. American Motors Sales Corp.

570 F.2d 1226

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1978-04-04
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: American Motors Sales Corporation has brought this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s ruling that an individual who brings a private action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq. (ADEA), is entitled to recover punitive damages and to a trial by jury. In Dean v. American Sec. Ins.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Murphy v. American Motors Sales Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
9 opinions
MURPHY v. AMERICAN MOTORS SALES CORPORATION,570 F.2d 1226(5th Cir. 1978)
HENRY H. MURPHY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. AMERICAN MOTORS SALES CORPORATION,
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
JERRY S. WILSON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. AMERICAN MOTORS SALES CORPORATION,
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Nos. 76-2718 and 76-2772.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 4, 1978.
Charles H. Kirbo, Charles M. Shaffer, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellant.

Vincent W. Roses, Jr., L. Burke Lewis, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Robert E. Williams, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae Equal Employment Advisory Council.
Appeals from the United States District Court, Northern District of Georgia.Page 1227
Before AINSWORTH and MORGAN, Circuit Judges, and LYNNE, District Judge.fn*
PER CURIAM:
[1] American Motors Sales Corporation has brought this interlocutory appeal from the trial court's ruling that an individual who brings a private action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967,29 U.S.C. § 621,etseq.(ADEA), is entitled to recover punitive damages and to a trial by jury.

[2] InDean v. American Sec. Ins. Co.,559 F.2d 1036(5th Cir. 1977), we definitively held that punitive damages are not recoverable in a private action brought under ADEA.

[3] It is now settled that in such an action a trial by jury on a claim for lost wages is available where sought by one of the parties.Lorillard v. Pons,___ U.S. ___,98 S.Ct. 866,55 L.Ed.2d 40(1978).

[4] The trial court's order overruling appellant's motion to strike the jury demand is affirmed; its order overruling appellant's motion to strike the prayer for punitive damages is reversed.

[5] AFFIRMED IN PART.

[6] REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART.
  1. Senior District Judge of the Northern District of Alabama, sitting by designation. ↩