Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. William W. Holland

565 F.2d 383

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1978-01-04
Topic: general

BY THE COURT: The mandate of the court having prematurely issued incident to the panel opinion and having properly been complied with by the district court, and the cause having thereafter been voted en banc by the court, IT IS ORDERED that the mandate herein remain undisturbed, that the opinion of the panel, reported at 552 F.2d 667, be withdrawn, and that the en banc court be dissolved.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. William W. Holland. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 8 opinions

UNITED STATES v. HOLLAND,565 F.2d 383(5th Cir. 1978)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. WILLIAM W. HOLLAND,

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

No. 76-3763.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

January 4, 1978.

Sterling G. Culpepper, Jr. (Court-Appointed), Charles S. Coody, Montgomery, Ala., for defendant-appellant.

Barry E. Teague, U.S. Atty., Milton L. Moss, Asst. U.S. Atty., Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama; Frank M. Johnson, Jr., Chief Judge.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH,Page 384GODBOLD, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

[1] The mandate of the court having prematurely issued incident to the panel opinion and having properly been complied with by the district court, and the cause having thereafter been voted en banc by the court,

[2] IT IS ORDERED that the mandate herein remain undisturbed, that the opinion of the panel, reported at552 F.2d 667, be withdrawn, and that the en banc court be dissolved.Page 871