Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Rush O. Nichols v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent

556 F.2d 1330

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1977-09-06
Topic
general

GEE, Circuit Judge: Petitioner was convicted in 1973 in Texas state court of robbery by assault 1 *1331 and was sentenced to life imprisonment under the Texas habitual offender statute. 2 He here alleges that the state improperly relied on a 1965 Oklahoma conviction to enhance his sentence for three reasons: (1) he was denied counsel on appeal from that conviction; (2) Texas law prohibits the use of a capital felony such as the Oklahoma conviction to enhance a noncapital felony such as the Texas conviction; and (3) the state failed to prove that petitioner was afforded an examining trial prior to the 1965 conviction. Because federal courts do not review a state’s failure to adhere to its own sentencing procedures, 3 and because the Constitution does not require a state preliminary hearing, 4 only the first contention presents a possible basis for habeas corpus relief. But petitioner’s counsel failed to object to the admission of the Oklahoma conviction on the ground that counsel had not been provided on appeal. 5 This failure worked a waiver of the constitutional error complained of here. Wainwright v. Sykes, - U.S. -, 97 S.Ct. 2497, 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977); Loud v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Rush O. Nichols v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
16 opinions
NICHOLS v. ESTELLE,556 F.2d 1330(5th Cir. 1977)
RUSH O. NICHOLS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. W. J. ESTELLE, JR., DIRECTOR,
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE.
No. 76-3108.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
August 5, 1977.
Rehearing Denied September 6, 1977.
Frank D. Scarborough, Abilene, Tex. (Court-appointed), for petitioner-appellant.

John L. Hill, Atty. Gen., Robert E. DeLong, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., W. Barton Boling, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Kendall, 1st Asst. Atty. Gen., Joe B. Dibrell, Gilbert Pena, Asst. Attys. Gen., El Paso, Tex., for respondent-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
Before COLEMAN, Circuit Judge, KUNZIG,fn*Associate Judge, and GEE, Circuit Judge.
GEE, Circuit Judge:
[1] Petitioner was convicted in 1973 in Texas state court of robbery by assault1Page 1331and was sentenced to life imprisonment under the Texas habitual offender statute.2He here alleges that the state improperly relied on a 1965 Oklahoma conviction to enhance his sentence for three reasons: (1) he was denied counsel on appeal from that conviction; (2) Texas law prohibits the use of a capital felony such as the Oklahoma conviction to enhance a noncapital felony such as the Texas conviction; and (3) the state failed to prove that petitioner was afforded an examining trial prior to the 1965 conviction. Because federal courts do not review a state's failure to adhere to its own sentencing procedures,3and because the Constitution does not require a state preliminary hearing,4only the first contention presents a possible basis for habeas corpus relief.

[2] But petitioner's counsel failed to object to the admission of the Oklahoma conviction on the ground that counsel had not been provided on appeal.5This failure worked a waiver of the constitutional error complained of here.Wainwright v. Sykes,___ U.S. ___,97 S.Ct. 2497,53 L.Ed.2d 594(1977);Loud v.Estelle,556 F.2d 1326(5th Cir. 1977).See also St. John v.Estelle,544 F.2d 894(5th Cir. 1977).

[3] The district court's order denying relief is AFFIRMED.
  1. Associate Judge of the U.S. Court of Claims, sitting by designation. ↩
  2. The conviction was affirmed on appeal.Nichols v. State,511 S.W.2d 269(Tex.Cr.App. 1974). State habeas corpus relief was denied without written opinion. ↩
  3. Tex.Penal Code Ann. §12.42(1974). ↩
  4. Willeford v. Estelle,538 F.2d 1194(5th Cir. 1976). ↩
  5. Harris v. Estelle,487 F.2d 1293(5th Cir. 1974). ↩
  6. A general objection on other grounds was made and overruled. ↩