Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Golden v. Golden

535 F.2d 213

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1976-06-03
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: We affirm for the reasons stated in Judge Weinfeld’s opinion below, 411 F.Supp. 1076 (D.C.1976).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Golden v. Golden. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
MATTER OF GOLDEN,535 F.2d 213(2nd Cir. 1976)
IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT K. GOLDEN, BANKRUPT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. RENEE
GOLDEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
No. 1117, Docket 76-5015.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued June 3, 1976.
Decided June 3, 1976.
George Friedman, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Aaron Gelbwaks, New York City (Gelbwaks Pollack, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.
Appeal by Robert Golden, a bankrupt, from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Edward Weinfeld,Judge,affirming an order of Roy Babbitt,Bankruptcy Judge,dismissing Golden's complaint. The complaint sought judgment that a December, 1974 Family Court judgment against Golden was not alimony or support within the meaning of § 17(a)(7) of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C. § 35(a)(7).
Before KAUFMAN, Chief Judge, CLARK, Associate Justice,fn*and TIMBERS, Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
[1] We affirm for the reasons stated in Judge Weinfeld's opinion below, 411 F.Supp. 1076 (D.C. 1976).Page 676
  1. United States Supreme Court, retired, sitting by designation. ↩