Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Clark v. Weinberger

511 F.2d 1390

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1975-01-24
Topic: general

PER CURIAM: Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Vermont. The order is affirmed on the opinion of Honorable James S. Holden, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Vermont, 389 F.Supp. 1168.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Clark v. Weinberger. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 4 opinions

CLARK v. WEINBERGER,511 F.2d 1390(2nd Cir. 1975)

MARSHALL W. CLARK, JR., APPELLANT, v. CASPAR WEINBERGER, SECRETARY OF THE

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE, APPELLEES.

Cal. No. 576, Docket 74-2358.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued January 15, 1975.

Decided January 24, 1975.

Kenneth Goodman, St. Albans, Vt. (Douglas L. Molde, Vermont Legal Aid, Inc., St. Albans, Vt.), for appellant.

William B. Gray, Asst. U.S. Atty., District of Vermont (George W. F. Cook, U.S. Atty., District of Vermont, and Samuel C. Fish, Regional Atty. and George Eng, Asst. Regional Atty., Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare, Boston, Mass., of counsel), for appellee.

Before WATERMAN, FRIENDLY and GURFEIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[1] Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Vermont. The order is affirmed on the opinion of Honorable James S. Holden, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Vermont, 389 F.Supp. 1168.Page 15