Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Nazareth Gates, and United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. John Collier, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary

Nazareth Gates, & United States of Am., Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. John Collier, Superintendent, Miss. State Penitentiary, 500 F.2d 1382 (5th Cir. 1974)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1974-09-09
Topic: general

How later courts describe this case

hearing en banc on the issue of attorneys’ fees

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Nazareth Gates, and United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. John Collier, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 8 opinions

GATES v. COLLIER,500 F.2d 1382(5th Cir. 1974)

NAZARETH GATES ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,

AND

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR-APPELLEE, v. JOHN COLLIER,

SUPERINTENDENT, MISSISSIPPI STATE PENITENTIARY, ET AL.,

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

No. 73-1790.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

September 9, 1974.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. of Miss., William A. Allain, Asst. Atty. Gen., P. Roger Googe, Jr., Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, Miss., for defendants-appellants.

Roy S. Haber, Native American Rights Fund, Boulder, Colo., Frank R. Parker, Jackson, Miss., Edward J. Reilly, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Michael Davidson, Jesse H. Queen, Thomas R. Sheran, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Div., Washington, D.C., H. M. Ray, U.S. Atty., Oxford, Miss., for intervenor.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi, William C. Keady, Chief Judge,349 F. Supp. 881.

[1] ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

[2] (Opinion December 5, 1973, 5 Cir., 1974,489 F.2d 298).

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY and GEE, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

[3] A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc.

[4] It is ordered that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.Page 76