Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

The United States of America v. Ernest Wesley Miller

499 F.2d 1247

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1974-07-08
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: The Court has considered the petition for rehearing en banc with respect to the retroactivity issue only, and is of the opinion that the decision of the panel 5 Cir., 492 F.2d 37 is correct. The petition for rehearing is in all other respects denied by the panel.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed The United States of America v. Ernest Wesley Miller. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
6 opinions
UNITED STATES v. MILLER,499 F.2d 1247(5th Cir. 1974)
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ERNEST WESLEY MILLER,
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
No. 73-1083.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
July 8, 1974.
Ray Gene Smith, Wichita Falls, Tex. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.
Anthony J. P. Farris, U.S. Atty., Robert G. Darden, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Ben C. Connally, Chief Judge.
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY and GEE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
[1] The Court has considered the petition for rehearing en banc with respect to the retroactivity issue only, and is of the opinion that the decision of the panel 5 Cir.,492 F.2d 37is correct. The petition for rehearing is in all other respects denied by the panel.Page 86