Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

WHITMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 49 F.2d 1087 (2nd Cir. 1931)

Clarence WHITMAN, Petitioner, v. Comm’r OF INTERNAL REVENUE,Respondent., 49 F.2d 1087 (2d Cir. 1931)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1931-05-18
Topic: general

WHITMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 49 F.2d 1087 (2nd Cir. 1931) Clarence WHITMAN, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,Respondent. No. 48.Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. May 18, 1931.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed WHITMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 49 F.2d 1087 (2nd Cir. 1931). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

WHITMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,49 F.2d 1087(2nd Cir. 1931)

Clarence WHITMAN, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent.

No. 48.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 18, 1931.

Appeal from the United States Board of Tax Appeals.

Milbank, Tweed, Hope Webb, of New York City (Daniel B. Priest, of New York City, of counsel), for petitioner.

G.A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and J.P. Jackson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen. (C.M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Robert L. Williams, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D.C., of counsel), for respondent.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed.Page 6