Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Husserl v. Swiss Air Transport Co.

Husserl v. Swiss Air Transp. Co., 485 F.2d 1240 (2d Cir. 1973)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1973-10-31
Topic: general

PER CURIAM: The order of the district court is affirmed, essentially for the reasons set forth by Judge Tyler in his well considered opinion, 351 F.Supp. 702, at 706-707 (S.D.N.Y.1972).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Husserl v. Swiss Air Transport Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 11 opinions

HUSSERL v. SWISS AIR TRANSPORT COMPANY, LTD.,485 F.2d 1240(2nd Cir. 1973)

GRETA HUSSERL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. SWISS AIR TRANSPORT COMPANY, LTD. ALSO

KNOWN AS SWISSAIR, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

No. 42, Docket 73-1501.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued October 23, 1973.

Decided October 31, 1973.

George N. Tompkins, Jr., New York City (Condon Forsyth, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellant.

Eric Gewurz, Bellmore, N.Y. (Edward J. Waldman, Gewurz Gewurz, P. C., Bellmore, N.Y., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Before SMITH, MANSFIELD and OAKES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[1] The order of the district court is affirmed, essentially for the reasons set forth by Judge Tyler in his well considered opinion, 351 F.Supp. 702, at 706-707 (S.D.N.Y. 1972).Page 1272