Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Jones v. Bales

Jones v. Bales, 480 F.2d 805 (5th Cir. 1973)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1973-02-21
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of the reasons stated and authorities cited in the final order, Jones v. Bales, N.D.Ga.1972, 58 F.R.D. 453.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Jones v. Bales. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
37 opinions
JONES v. BALES,480 F.2d 805(5th Cir. 1973)
OTTIS MAYO JONES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GERTRUDE BALES ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.
No. 72-3333.
Summary Calendar.fn*
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
February 21, 1973.
Ottis Mayo Jones, pro se.

Gertrude Bales, pro se.

Louis C. Woolf, Knoxville, Tenn., and John E. Dougherty, Atlanta, Ga., for Cheatham and Waggoner.

John W. Stokes, Jr., U.S. Atty., and Beverly B. Bates, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for Kirksey and Taylor.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; Sidney O. Smith, Jr., Chief Judge.
Before GEWIN, COLEMAN and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
[1] The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of the reasons stated and authorities cited in the final order, Jones v. Bales, N.D.Ga. 1972,58 F.R.D. 453.Page 933
  1. Rule 18, 5 Cir.; Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970,431 F.2d 409, Part I. ↩