Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

477 F.2d 567

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1973-06-01
Topic: litigation

PER CURIAM: The judgment of the district court, denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment is affirmed for the reasons given therein, as reported in 328 F.Supp. 69 (E.D.Wash.1971). Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

UNITED STATES v. U.S. FIDELITY GUARANTY CO.,477 F.2d 567(9th Cir. 1973)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND

GUARANTY COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

No. 71-2245.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 1, 1973.

Richard A. Scully, Washington, D.C. (argued), Dean C. Smith, U.S. Atty., Carroll D. Gray, Asst. U.S. Atty., Spokane, Wash., Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks, Crombie J. D. Garrett, John J. McCarthy, John M. Dowd, Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant.

Richard C. Fields (argued), of Moffatt, Thomas, Barrett Blanton, Boise, Idaho, Eugene I. Annis, of Myers, Reiley Annis, Spokane, Wash., for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington; Charles L. Powell, Judge.

Before KILKENNY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and BELLONI,^fn*District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

[1] The judgment of the district court, denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granting defendant's motion for summary judgment is affirmed for the reasons given therein, as reported in328 F. Supp. 69(E.D.Wash. 1971).

[2] Affirmed.Page 688

Honorable Robert C. Belloni, United States District Judge, District of Oregon, sitting by designation. ↩