Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Ridinger v. General Motors Corp.

474 F.2d 949

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1972-10-13
Topic: general

How later courts describe this case

case remanded in part because of the failure to describe the class in the judgment entry

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ridinger v. General Motors Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 4 opinions

RIDINGER v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION,474 F.2d 949(6th Cir. 1972)

HELEN RIDINGER ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

AND

CLARA D. JOHNSON ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. GENERAL MOTORS

CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

Nos. 71-1934, 71-1937.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Argued April 20, 1972.

Decided October 13, 1972.

Dennis E. Murray, Sandusky, Ohio (Murray Murray Co., Sandusky, Ohio, Thomas C. Waechter, Bieser, Greer Landis, Dayton, Ohio, on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants.

Charles P. Pfarrer, Dayton, Ohio (Cowden, Pfarrer, Crew Becker, Dayton, Ohio, Ross L. Malone, Detroit, Mich., on brief), for General Motors.

Susan Deller Ross, EEOC, Washington, D.C. (Howard Besser, Dist. Atty., Cleveland, Ohio, on brief), amici curiae for Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Ruth Weyand, Washington, D.C., and Sorrell Logethetis, Knee, Snyder Parks, Dayton, Ohio (Winn Newman, Washington, D.C., and Richard Rice, Kettering, Ohio, on brief), for Union.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, KENT, Circuit Judge, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge.

[1] ORDER

[2] These appeals are from judgments entered in the trial court disposing of cases which were commenced as class actions under the provisions of Rule23, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. The trial court,325 F. Supp. 1089, failed to determine whether the actions could be maintained as class actions as required by Rule 23(c), and the judgments from which these appeals are taken do not "include and describe those whom the court finds to be members of the class."

[3] It is, therefore, ordered that the judgments of the trial court are reversed and the cases remanded for further proceedings pursuant to Rule23, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and for consideration in the light of this Court's opinion in Manning v. International Union and General Motors Corp.,466 F.2d 812, decided September 11, 1972.Page 950