Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Tartell v. Chelsea National Bank

Tartell v. Chelsea Nat’l Bank, 470 F.2d 994 (2d Cir. 1972)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1972-11-15
Topic: litigation

PER CURIAM: The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated in Judge Tyler’s opinion below. 351 F.Supp. 1071.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Tartell v. Chelsea National Bank. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

TARTELL v. CHELSEA NATIONAL BANK,470 F.2d 994(2nd Cir. 1972)

JOEL J. TARTELL, APPELLANT, v. CHELSEA NATIONAL BANK, APPELLEE.

No. 156, Docket 72-1665.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued November 15, 1972.

Decided November 15, 1972.

Harold L. Young, New York City (Young, Sonnenfeld Busner, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Jerome J. Londin, New York City (Carro, Spanbock Londin, Kenneth A. Lapatine, New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Harold R. Tyler, Jr., Judge.

Before SMITH, KAUFMAN and MULLIGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[1] The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated in Judge Tyler's opinion below. 351 F.Supp. 1071.Page 1111