Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Hairston v. Hutzler

468 F.2d 621

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1972-11-13
Topic
general

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM: This is an appeal from a preliminary injunction under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Aft*622er careful consideration of the record and the District Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law in Civil No. 71-826 (W.D.Pa., filed Nov. 18, 1971), 334 F.Supp. 251, the order of the District Court will be affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hairston v. Hutzler. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
HAIRSTON v. HUTZLER,468 F.2d 621(3rd Cir. 1972)
EARLY W. HAIRSTON, JR., ET AL. v. JOSEPH HUTZLER ET AL., APPELLANTS IN NO.
72-1060.
APPEAL OF WILLIAM KAUFMAN IN NO. 72-1059.
Nos. 72-1059, 72-1060.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Submitted Under Third Circuit Rule 12(6) October 5, 1972.
Decided November 13, 1972.
Peter J. Mansmann, Mansmann, Beggy, McVerry Baxter, and Herbert Bennett Conner, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants.

John B. Leete, Laurence B. Green, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellees.
Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Rabe Ferguson Marsh, Jr., Chief Judge.
Before SEITZ, Chief Judge, and FORMAN and HUNTER, Circuit Judges.
[1] OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM:
[2] This is an appeal from a preliminary injunction under42 U.S.C. § 1983. AfterPage 622careful consideration of the record and the District Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law in Civil No. 71-826 (W.D.Pa., filed Nov. 18, 1971),334 F. Supp. 251, the order of the District Court will be affirmed.Page 622