Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

H. L. Properties, Inc. v. Aerojet-General Corp.

468 F.2d 1397

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1972-11-13
Topic
commercial

PER CURIAM: We affirm the judgment below on the basis of the District Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order, 331 F.Supp. 1006. Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed H. L. Properties, Inc. v. Aerojet-General Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
H. L. PROPERTIES, v. AEROJET-GENERAL CORP.,468 F.2d 1397(5th Cir. 1972)
H.L. PROPERTIES, INC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. AEROJET-GENERAL
CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA, DEFENDANT-THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
No. 72-2011.
Summary Calendar.fn*
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 13, 1972.
Rehearing Denied December 19, 1972.
Robert W. Rust, U.S. Atty., Clemens Hagglund, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., Morton Hollander, James C. Hair, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the United States.

A. Dan Killian, Jr., George L. Knight, Miami, Fla., Turner Hodson, Vernon W. Turner, Michael Watkins, Homestead, Fla., James E. Glass, Welsh Carroll, Smathers Thompson, Earl D. Waldin, Jr., Miami, Fla., for appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; C. Clyde Atkins, Judge.
Before THORNBERRY, COLEMAN and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
[1] We affirm the judgment below on the basis of the District Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order,331 F. Supp. 1006.

[2] Affirmed.
  1. Rule 18, 5th Cir.;seeIsbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970,431 F.2d 409, Part I. ↩