Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

United States v. Persico

United States v. Persico, 467 F.2d 485 (2d Cir. 1972)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1972-10-20
Topic: general

PER CURIAM: The order of the district court denying defendant Persico’s motion for a new trial is affirmed upon Judge Travia’s detailed opinion at 339 F.Supp. 1077 (E.D.N.Y.1972).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Persico. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status: pending
Cited by: 4 opinions

UNITED STATES v. PERSICO,467 F.2d 485(2nd Cir. 1972)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. CARMINE J. PERSICO, JR., APPELLANT.

No. 87, Docket 72-1472.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued October 18, 1972.

Decided October 20, 1972.

Maurice Edelbaum, New York City (Henry J. Boitel, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Shirley Baccus-Lobel, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. (Robert A. Morse, U.S. Atty., E. D. New York, Denis E. Dillon, James O. Druker, Sidney Glazer, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellee.

Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York; Anthony J. Travia, Judge.

Before MANSFIELD, OAKES and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[1] The order of the district court denying defendant Persico's motion for a new trial is affirmed upon Judge Travia's detailed opinion at 339 F.Supp. 1077 (E.D. N.Y. 1972).Page 602