Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Ralph d.crabtree v. Robert L. Brennan
466 F.2d 480
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1972-08-10
- Topic
- litigation
How later courts describe this case
- no right to work in a particular school district
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ralph d.crabtree v. Robert L. Brennan. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 15 opinions
CRABTREE v. BRENNAN,466 F.2d 480(6th Cir. 1972)
RALPH D. CRABTREE ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ROBERT L. BRENNAN ET
AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.
No. 72-1043.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
August 10, 1972.
James L. Graham, Graham Dutro, Columbus, Ohio, for defendants-appellees; Joseph A. Oths, Wellston, Ohio, Richard C. Deeg, Columbus, Ohio, on the brief.
Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, KENT, Circuit Judge, and O'SULLIVAN, Senior Circuit Judge.Page 481
[2] District Judge Joseph P. Kinneary granted defendants' motion for summary judgment on the ground that the facts alleged in the verified complaint gave rise to no federal cause of action. Crabtree appeals.
[3] Official conduct under color of law is actionable under42 U.S.C. § 1983only where plaintiff is thereby subjected to "the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution." The Constitution confers no right to be employed as a secondary school teacher by a particular school system.SeeBoard of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth,408 U.S. 564,92 S.Ct. 2701,33 L.Ed.2d 548(June 29, 1972); Orr v. Trinter,444 F.2d 128(6th Cir. 1971), cert. denied,408 U.S. 943,92 S.Ct. 2847,33 L.Ed.2d 767(June 29, 1972).
[4] Turning next to liability predicated on allegations of conspiracy, we note that42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) is limited by its terms to the redress of damages inflicted by conspiracies whose purpose is "depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws." It was not "intended to apply to all tortious conspiratorial interferences with the rights of others . . . [T]here must be some racial, or perhaps otherwise class-based, invidiously discriminatory animus behind the conspirators' action. Griffin v. Breckenridge,403 U.S. 88,101-102,91 S.Ct. 1790,1798,29 L.Ed.2d 338(1971) (footnote omitted).
[5] Grounds for relief under the Civil Rights Act of 1871 have not been shown. Accordingly, the decision of the District Court is affirmed.Page 490