Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

James Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Local 1291, International Longshoremen's Association (Ila)

461 F.2d 1262

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1972-07-20
Topic
general

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM: This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court invalidating a by-law *1263 of the defendant Union and ordering a new election. We are in accord with the decision of the district court substantially for the reasons given in that court’s opinion. See Shultz v. Local 1291, 338 F.Supp. 1204 (E.D.Pa.1972). Subsequent to its judgment ordering an election, and after this appeal was filed, the district court granted a continuance of a civil contempt proceeding instituted by the Secretary based on the alleged refusal of the Union to cooperate in the holding of the election.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed James Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Local 1291, International Longshoremen's Association (Ila). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions
HODGSON v. L. 1291 INT'L LONGSHOREMEN'S ASS'N,461 F.2d 1262(3rd Cir. 1972)
JAMES HODGSON, SECRETARY OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR v.
LOCAL 1291, INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION (ILA), APPELLANT.
No. 72-1134.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued June 22, 1972.
Decided July 20, 1972.
Abraham E. Freedman, Freedman, Borowsky Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Alan S. Rosenthal, Robert S. Greenspan, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Ralph C. Body, Judge.
Before SEITZ, Chief Judge, and JAMES ROSEN and HUNTER, Circuit Judges.
[1] OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM:
[2] This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court invalidating a by-lawPage 1263of the defendant Union and ordering a new election. We are in accord with the decision of the district court substantially for the reasons given in that court's opinion. See Shultz v. Local 1291,338 F. Supp. 1204(E.D.Pa. 1972).

[3] Subsequent to its judgment ordering an election, and after this appeal was filed, the district court granted a continuance of a civil contempt proceeding instituted by the Secretary based on the alleged refusal of the Union to cooperate in the holding of the election. Thereafter, the Secretary filed a motion in this appeal to vacate the district court's order of June 9, 1972, granting the continuance. In view of our affirmance on the merits, rather than act on the motion, we expect the district court promptly to vacate its continuance order.

[4] The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.Page 1