Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

United States v. Manfredonia

United States v. Manfredonia, 459 F.2d 1392 (2d Cir. 1972)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1972-05-26
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Frankel, reported at 341 F.Supp. 790 (S.D.N.Y. 1972).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Manfredonia. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
4 opinions
UNITED STATES v. MANFREDONIA,459 F.2d 1392(2nd Cir. 1972)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. JOHN E. MANFREDONIA,
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
No. 850, Docket 72-1403.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued May 26, 1972.
Decided May 26, 1972.
William T. Griffin, New York City (Peter Griffin, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant.

John J. Kenney, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Whitney North Seymour, Jr., U.S. Atty., S.D. New York, Peter F. Rient, Asst. U.S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.
Appeal from order of United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Marvin E. Frankel, J., revoking probation for failure to submit written monthly reports to Probation Office.
Before LEVENTHAL,fn**FEINBERG and MULLIGAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
[1] The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Frankel, reported at 341 F.Supp. 790 (S.D.N.Y. 1972).Page 446
  1. Of the United States Circuit Court for the District of Columbia, sitting by designation. ↩