Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Walden

458 F.2d 36

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1972-05-04
Topic
general

*37ORDER On reconsideration en banc, the decision of the district court with respect to the question of double jeopardy is affirmed by an equally divided court. The cases are remanded by the full court to the original panel for disposition of the remaining questions on appeal.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Walden. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
3 opinions
UNITED STATES v. WALDEN,458 F.2d 36(4th Cir. 1972)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. BILLY DELANO WALDEN, APPELLANT.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. GENE CLAUDE EASTERLING, APPELLANT.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. JOHN THOMAS ARD, APPELLANT.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. FRUENT C. KIMES, APPELLANT.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. ALBERT HARRY WEATHERSBY, APPELLANT.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. JOE PAT DAMOUR, APPELLANT.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. ROBERT EMERSON WHITE, APPELLANT.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. LOUIS PAUL MATRANGA, APPELLANT.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. WILLIAM STEVEN COOK, APPELLANT.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. RICHARD BRENT HOGAN, APPELLANT.
Nos. 14974-14983.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
May 4, 1972.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia; Robert W. Hemphill, Judge.
[1] On Reconsideration en Banc, 4 Cir.,448 F.2d 925.Page 37
[2] ORDER
[3] On reconsideration en banc, the decision of the district court with respect to the question of double jeopardy is affirmed by an equally divided court.

[4] The cases are remanded by the full court to the original panel for disposition of the remaining questions on appeal.Page 390