Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. William Randolph, Jr., AKA Clarence Randolph, AKA Bobby Moore

456 F.2d 689

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1972-05-26
Topic: general

PER CURIAM: The judgment of conviction in this passing counterfeit currency case is affirmed. We reject the challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. There are many scraps of evidence, each of which alone means little, put together they could mean a lot to a jury. On the facts here, disbelief of Randolph’s testimony could lead to some affirmative inferences of knowledge.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. William Randolph, Jr., AKA Clarence Randolph, AKA Bobby Moore. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

UNITED STATES v. RANDOLPH,456 F.2d 689(9th Cir. 1972)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. WILLIAM RANDOLPH, JR., AKA

CLARENCE RANDOLPH, AKA BOBBY MOORE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

No. 71-2873.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 10, 1972.

Rehearing Denied May 26, 1972.

Paul H. Lamboley, Reno, Nev., for defendant-appellant.

Joseph L. Ward, U.S. Atty., Raymond B. Little, Lawrence J. Semenza, Asst. U.S. Attys., Las Vegas, Nev., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada; Bruce R. Thompson, Judge.

Before CHAMBERS, WRIGHT and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[1] The judgment of conviction in this passing counterfeit currency case is affirmed.

[2] We reject the challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. There are many scraps of evidence, each of which alone means little, put together they could mean a lot to a jury.

[3] On the facts here, disbelief of Randolph's testimony could lead to some affirmative inferences of knowledge.Page 913