Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Terry Donald Martin v. United States

453 F.2d 1370

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1972-02-02
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 1 The errors asserted under Bruton v. United States, 1968, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476, if errors at all, are harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Harrington v. California, 1969, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284. 1 .

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Terry Donald Martin v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions
MARTIN v. UNITED STATES,453 F.2d 1370(5th Cir. 1972)
TERRY DONALD MARTIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
No. 71-3479.
Summary Calendar.fn*
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
February 2, 1972.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
Before BELL, DYER, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
[1] Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1The errors asserted under Bruton v. United States, 1968,391 U.S. 123,88 S.Ct. 1620,20 L.Ed.2d 476, if errors at all, are harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Harrington v. California, 1969,395 U.S. 250,89 S.Ct. 1726,23 L.Ed.2d 284.
  1. Rule 18, 5 Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970,431 F.2d 409. ↩
  2. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970,430 F.2d 966. ↩