Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Globe Gear Company v. National Labor Relations Board

Globe Gear Co. v. Nat’l Labor Rels. Bd., 451 F.2d 1348 (6th Cir. 1971)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1971-12-14
Topic: general

ORDER. This case is before the court on a petition to review and set aside the order of the National Labor Relations Board reported at 189 N.L.R.B. No. 56, and the cross-application of the Board for enforcement. Reference is made to the decision of the Board for a recitation of pertinent facts. Upon consideration, the court concludes that the settlement agreement was properly set aside in view of the company’s subsequent refusal to furnish the Union with requested financial data relevant for bargaining purposes; and that the decision of the Board is supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Globe Gear Company v. National Labor Relations Board. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

GLOBE GEAR v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,451 F.2d 1348(6th Cir. 1971)

GLOBE GEAR COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,

RESPONDENT.

No. 71-1299.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

December 14, 1971.

Paul H. Townsend, Jr., Detroit, Mich., Dykema, Gossett, Spencer, Goodnow Trigg, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for petitioner.

Arthur L. Fox, II, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Eugene B. Granof, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for respondent.

On Petition to Review and Cross-Petition to Enforce an Order of National Labor Relations Board.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and EDWARDS and BROOKS, Circuit Judges.

[1] ORDER.

[2] This case is before the court on a petition to review and set aside the order of the National Labor Relations Board reported at 189 N.L.R.B. No. 56, and the cross-application of the Board for enforcement. Reference is made to the decision of the Board for a recitation of pertinent facts.

[3] Upon consideration, the court concludes that the settlement agreement was properly set aside in view of the company's subsequent refusal to furnish the Union with requested financial data relevant for bargaining purposes; and that the decision of the Board is supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole.

[4] It is ordered that enforcement be granted.Page 1349