Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Ida M. Picking v. State Finance Corporation

Ida M. Picking v. State Fin. Corp., 450 F.2d 881 (4th Cir. 1971)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1971-10-14
Topic: general

PER CURIAM: We have carefully considered the briefs and the record and conclude that oral argument is unnecessary. We, therefore, affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Picking v. State Finance Corp. et al., 332 F.Supp. 1399 (D.Md.1971). Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ida M. Picking v. State Finance Corporation. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 6 opinions

PICKING v. STATE FINANCE CORPORATION,450 F.2d 881(4th Cir. 1971)

IDA M. PICKING, APPELLANT, v. STATE FINANCE CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLEES.

No. 71-1600.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

October 14, 1971.

Ida M. Picking pro se.

Francis B. Burch, Atty. Gen. of Maryland, Alfred J. O'Ferrall, III, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Maryland, and Oscar W. Zenitz, Baltimore, Md., on the brief, for appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; Frank A. Kaufman, Judge.

Before WINTER, CRAVEN and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[1] We have carefully considered the briefs and the record and conclude that oral argument is unnecessary. We, therefore, affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Picking v. State Finance Corp. et al.,332 F. Supp. 1399(D.Md. 1971).

[2] Affirmed.Page 943