Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Eduardo Osuna-Lorona

United States v. Eduardo Osuna-Lorona, 448 F.2d 1355 (9th Cir. 1971)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1971-09-30
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: The judgment and conviction in this narcotics case for transporting and facilitating the sale of 10 ounces of heroin is affirmed. The district court’s resolution of conflicting facts concerning the admissibility of appellant's statement must be sustained on appeal, and the 10 year sentence he received does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment. Gallego v. United States, 276 F.2d 914, 917-918 (9 Cir. 1960); Black v. United States, 269 F.2d 38, 43 (9 Cir. 1959).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Eduardo Osuna-Lorona. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
UNITED STATES v. OSUNA-LORONA,448 F.2d 1355(9th Cir. 1971)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eduardo OSUNA-LORONA,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 26338.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
September 30, 1971.
Rush G. Glick, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Harry D. Steward, U.S. Atty., Robert H. Filsinger, Chief, Criminal Division,Page 1356Phillip W. Johnson, Special Asst. U.S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before KOELSCH, CARTER and CHOY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment and conviction in this narcotics case for transporting and facilitating the sale of 10 ounces of heroin is affirmed. The district court's resolution of conflicting facts concerning the admissibility of appellant's statement must be sustained on appeal, and the 10 year sentence he received does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment. Gallego v. United States,276 F.2d 914, 917-918 (9 Cir. 1960); Black v. United States,269 F.2d 38, 43 (9 Cir. 1959).Page 1391