Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

George Robert Boykins, United States of America, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellant v. The Board of Education of the City of Fairfield, Alabama

446 F.2d 973

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1971-06-28
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • remanding for reconsideration in the light of new Supreme Court decision

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed George Robert Boykins, United States of America, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellant v. The Board of Education of the City of Fairfield, Alabama. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions
BOYKINS v. BD., EDUC., CITY, FAIRFIELD, ALA.,446 F.2d 973(5th Cir. 1971)
George Robert BOYKINS et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, United States of
America, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellant, v. The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF
the CITY OF FAIRFIELD, ALABAMA, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 29785.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 28, 1971.
Demetrius C. Newton, Birmingham, Ala., Norman C. Amaker, Jack Greenberg, Norman Chachkin, New York City, for appellants.

Theodore J. Garrish, Justice Dept., Washington, D.C., for the United States, intervenor.

Maurice Bishop, Birmingham, Ala., for appellees.
Before WISDOM, COLEMAN, and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Subsequent to the date of the district court's decree from which this appeal has been taken, the Supreme Court decided Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 1971,402 U.S. 1,91 S.Ct. 1267,28 L.Ed.2d 554. We think that the district court, because of its familiarity with local conditions, should have the first opportunity to determine whether the school desegregation plan the court approved for the Board of Education of the City of Fairfield, Alabama, complies with the principles established in theSwanndecision.

We remand this cause therefore to the district court for it to determineforthwiththe acceptability of the schoolPage 974board's student assignment plan. In making this determination the court should consider the feasibility and advantages of clustering schools or noncontiguous zoning. The district court should also consider whether the school board is in compliance with theSingletonrequirements for faculty ratios and whether the location of a high school complex in a black neighborhood will tend to promote segregation as alleged by plaintiffs-appellants.

The case is remanded to the district court for further consideration.

Costs shall be divided between the parties.

The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.Page 1002