Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Andres v. Southwestern Pipe, Inc.

446 F.2d 899

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1971-08-20
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: Affirmed.1 See Local Rule 21.** . The decision appealed from is reported as Andres v. Southwestern Pipe, Inc., W.D.La.1971, 321 F.Supp. 895. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Andres v. Southwestern Pipe, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
ANDRES v. SOUTHWESTERN PIPE, INC.,446 F.2d 899(5th Cir. 1971)
James D. ANDRES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN PIPE, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 71-1981 Summary Calendar.fn**
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
August 20, 1971.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District ofPage 900Louisiana; Richard J. Putnam, Judge,321 F. Supp. 895.
George M. Strickler, Jr., Robert F. Collins, New Orleans, La., Richard T. Seymour, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant; Richard B. Sobol, Washington, D.C., of counsel.

David L. McComb, New Orleans, La., Stanley E. Rauhut, Ben H. Powell, Jr., Houston, Tex., Chaffe, McCall, Phillips, Burke, Toler Sarpy, New Orleans, La., Powell, Brown Maverick, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellee.
Before COLEMAN, SIMPSON and MORGAN, Circuit Judges:
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed.1See Local Rule 21.fn**Page 904
  1. Rule 18, 5 Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970,431 F.2d 409, Part I. ↩
  2. The decision appealed from is reported as Andres v. Southwestern Pipe, Inc., W.D.La. 1971,321 F. Supp. 895. ↩
  3. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970,430 F.2d 966. ↩