Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Jay Lamarche, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Sunbeam Television Corporation A/K/A Wckt Television Station, No. 71-1465 Summary Calendar. (1) Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

Jay Lamarche, Individually & on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Sunbeam Television Corp. A/K/A Wckt Television Station, No. 71-1465 Summary Calendar. (1) Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. of N.Y., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I, 446 F.2d 880 (5th Cir. 1971)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1971-08-09
Topic: general

446 F.2d 880 Jay LAMARCHE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUNBEAM TELEVISION CORPORATION a/k/a WCKT Television Station, Defendant-Appellee. No. 71-1465 Summary Calendar.* *(1) Rule 18, 5 Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Jay Lamarche, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Sunbeam Television Corporation A/K/A Wckt Television Station, No. 71-1465 Summary Calendar. (1) Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

446 F.2d 880

Jay LAMARCHE, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SUNBEAM TELEVISION CORPORATION a/k/a WCKT Television
Station, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 71-1465 Summary Calendar.*
*(1) Rule 18, 5 Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970,
431 F.2d 409, Part I.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 9, 1971.

Jon D. Caminez, Bishop C. Holifield, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.

Aaron M. Kanner, and Richard Kanner, Miami, Fla., for defendant-appellee.

Before COLEMAN, SIMPSON and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Jay Lamarche appeals from orders of the district court denying motions (1) to proceed in forma pauperis, and (2) to maintain his suit as a class action. We determine that under the circumstances present neither order is a final decision appealable under Title 28, U.S.C., Section 1291, nor an interlocutory order appealable under Title 28, U.S.C. Section 1292. The appeal is accordingly ordered dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Caceres v. International Air Transport Association, 2 Cir. 1970, 422 F.2d 141; City of New York v. International Pipe & Ceramics Corporation, 2 Cir. 1969, 410 F.2d 295; Walsh v. City of Detroit, 6 Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 226; Eisen v. Carlisle and Jacquelin, 2 Cir. 1966, 370 F.2d 119; Gomez v. United States, 5 Cir. 1957, 245 F.2d 346.

Appeal dismissed.